VOlUME 04 ISSUE 01 JANUARY 2025
1Inolin Titiyanty, 2Pribadiyono, 3Akhmad Riduwan
1,2,3STIESIA, Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2025.v4i1n02Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This study aims to explore the experiences of informants who work in merged companies. This study focuses on how informants are able to inform and interpret mergers. The meaning of mergers is explored through a qualitative approach. Observation and in-depth interviews were used as data collection techniques conducted from 2021 to 2023. Data analysis techniques were carried out using triangulation until the data was considered saturated. This study succeeded in exploring mergers at two levels of analysis units, namely organizations and individuals. Researchers found a duality that occurred between the tangible and intangible dimensions at the organizational level and the phenomenological dimension as the center between the tangible and intangible dimensions like a dynamically rotating circle. This duality ultimately contributed to the merger which researchers viewed as an advanced merger concept.
KEYWORDS:Merger, Tangible, Intangible, Fenomenologis, Sensemaking
REFERENCES
1) E. J. Maile, M. Mitra, P. Ovseiko, and S. Dopson, “Merger and post-merger integration at Oxford University Hospitals: mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned,” J. Health Organ. Manag., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 503–520, 2022, doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2021-0024.
2) K. F. Čiković, J. Lozić, and M. Guzovski, “Do mergers and acquisitions improve bank efficiency? Evidence from North Macedonia,” J. Int. Stud., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 77–93, 2022, doi: 10.14254/2071-8330.2022/15-2/6.
3) A. Mariani, A. Cifalinò, I. E. Lisi, and M. G. Rizzo, “Management accounting change in merger and acquisitions: a multiple-case study,” J. Account. Organ. Chang., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 252–276, 2024, doi: 10.1108/JAOC-01-2024-0004.
4) M. E. Graebner, K. H. Heimeriks, Q. N. Huy, and E. Vaara, “The process of postmerger integration: A review and agenda for future research,” Acad. Manag. Ann., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–32, 2017, doi: 10.5465/annals.2014.0078.
5) F. BAUER and K. MATZLER, “ANTECEDENTS OF M&A SUCCESS: THE ROLE OF STRATEGIC COMPLEMENTARITY, CULTURAL FIT, AND DEGREE AND SPEED OF INTEGRATION,” Business, vol. 920, no. October, pp. 1–43, 2010, doi: 10.1002/smj.
6) K. E. Weick, “Enacted Sensemaking in Crisis Situations1,” J. Manag. Stud., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 305–317, 1988, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00039.x.
7) B. Dervin, “Sense-making theory and practice: an overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 36–46, 1998, doi: 10.1108/13673279810249369.