Myra M. Cuevas

B. Reyes St., Poblacion Barangay 10, Lipa City, Batangas

DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2024.v3i6n26

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This study aims to measure the extent of the utilization of the 2C2IR pedagogical approach in teaching mathematics. This study will also examine the respondents’ level of performance in mathematics in terms of assessment, written works, and performance tasks to identify if there is a significant relationship between the extent of the utilization of the 2C2IR pedagogical approach and the respondents’ level of performance in mathematics. Based on the conclusions, future research may replicate this study using different schools with an increased number of respondents. Future researchers can make a training program as an output of the research based on the answers of the respondents. Future researchers validate the training program. Future researchers could use this study as their guide or reference for follow-up and future studies.

KEYWORDS:

Pedagogical Approaches, teaching-learning method, assessment, written works, performance tasks

REFERENCES

1) Albayrak, M., Simsek, M., & Yazıcı, N. (2018). The predictive power to mathematicalsuccess of belief and reflective thinking for problem solving. Journal of Human Sciences, 15(2), 807-815. doi: 10.14687/jhs.v15i2.5141

2) Aprebo, G. (2002). The Impact of using Cognitive and Meta Cognitive Teaching Strategies on the Reading Comprehension of the High Basic Stage Female Students. Doctorate dissertation, Arab Amman University, Amman, Jordan

3) Bassarear, H. 2006. Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.

4) Briandley, J. E.; Walti C. H. and Blaschke L.M. (2009). Creating Collaborative groups in an online environment. Retrieved from Home-10-3-Briandley on 16-8-2013

5) Demirel, M., Derman, İ., & Karagedik, E. (2015). A study on the relationship between reflective thinking skills towards problem solving and attitudes towards mathematics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 2086-2096.

6) Epstein, A. S. (2003). How planing and reflection develop young children’s thinking skills young children. https://www.brandeis.edu/lemberg/employees/pdf/planningandreflection.p

7) Kızılkaya, G. & Aşkar, P. (2009). The development of a reflective thinking skill scale towards problem solving. Education and Science, 34(154), 82-92.

8) Gür, H. & Kandemir, M. A. (2006). Creativity and mathematics education. Elementary Education Online, 5(1), 65-72.

9) Hollenbeck, J.E. Integration of Mathematics and Science: Doing it correctly for once. BJSEP 2007, 1, 77–81

10) Mamolo, L. A., & Hindawi. (2022). Online Learning and Students’ Mathematics Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Anxiety in the “New Normal.” Online Learning and Students’ Mathematics Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Anxiety in the “New Normal”; doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9439634

11) National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

12) Republic Act No 10533. (2013). https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/. (Accessed 17 March 2022).

13) Retna, K. S. (2016). Thinking about “design thinking”: A study of teacher experiences.Asia Pacific Journal of Edu

14) Simplicio, H., Gasteiger, H., Dorneles, B. V., Grimes, K. R., Haase, V. G., Ruiz, C., et al. (2020). Cognitive Research and Mathematics Education—How Can Basic Research Reach the Classroom? Front. Psychol. 11:773. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00773

15) Schaub, B. (2021). Creating Community: A Case Study of Students’ Experiences in Inquiry-Based Learning. : Oregon State University.

16) Soylu, Y. & Soylu, C. (2006). The role of problem solving in mathematics lessons for success. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 7(11), 97-111.

VOlUME 03 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2024