JUNE 2024

VOlUME 03 ISSUE 06 June 2024
Intellectual Capital Moderates the Relationship between Good Corporate Governance and Company Performance
1Tati Rosyati, 2Fery Citra Febriyanto, 3Fina Fitriyana
1,2,3Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2024.v3i6n22

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This study empirically examines the effect of Good Corporate Governance, proxied by the Board of Commissioners, Audit Committee, and Independent Commissioner, on company performance measured using Economic Value Added (EVA), with Intellectual Capital as a moderating variable. The research focuses on state-owned enterprises listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2018-2022. The study employs a quantitative research method with an associative approach. Purposive sampling was used to obtain a sample of 50 data points. Secondary data was collected through documentation techniques, specifically annual reports of the state-owned enterprises for the period 2018-2022. The analysis methods include descriptive statistical analysis, classical assumption tests, panel data regression analysis, Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA), t-test, F-test, and coefficient of determination, using Eviews 9 software. The findings indicate that (1) the moderating variable does not significantly moderate the relationship between Good Corporate Governance and EVA, (2) the Adjusted R-squared value is 0.170783, indicating that the variables X1, X2, X3, M, X1M, X2M, and X3M collectively explain 17.07% of the variance in the dependent variable Y, and (3) after including the moderating variable, the influence of the independent variables on the dependent variable weakens from 25% (before moderation) to 17.07% (after moderation).

KEYWORDS:

Good Corporate Governance, Economic Value Added, Intellectual Capital, State-Owned Enterprises, Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA)

REFERENCES

1) Arifani, Y. (2013). The influence of audit committee size and independence to financial performance. Proceeding The 3rd International Conference on Management, Business, Economics and Education (ICMBEE), 1(1), 101–108.

2) Abdurahman, A. Z., & Gustyana, E. (2019). Economic value added and financial performance. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 3(2), 199–206.

3) Carolina, L. (2017). Corporate governance and its role in Indonesian national and international competitiveness. Journal of Economic Science, Management, and Accounting, 21(1), 27–34.

4) Fatmasari, R., & Dwiyanto, M. (2019). Economic value added (EVA) as an evaluation of company performance. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 20(1), 58–66.

5) FCGI (2001). Internal control and audit committee: Function, structure, and performance. Annual Conference on Good Corporate Governance Indonesia, 5(2), 40–52.

6) Fitriyana, D., & Rosyati, S. (2022). Good corporate governance and its impact on company performance. Journal of Business and Management, 8(1), 45–56.

7) Ghozali, I. (2013). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 20. Semarang, Indonesia: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

8) Ghozali, I. (2017). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 23. Semarang, Indonesia: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

9) KPK. (2018). Corruption in PT. Adhi Karya: Case study. Jakarta, Indonesia: Corruption Eradication Commission.

10) Kuspinta, U. R., & Husaini, H. (2018). Intellectual capital and its role in company profitability. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 3(2), 207–214.

11) Mawardi, A. P., et al. (2020). Intellectual capital and its components in enhancing company performance. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Management, 5(1), 71–80.

12) Nurcahyani, E., et al. (2013). The role of good corporate governance in mitigating agency problems. Journal of Financial Management, 4(2), 102–115.

13) Ovechkin, D., et al. (2021). The components of intellectual capital and their influence on company performance. Journal of Business and Management, 7(2), 89–98.

14) Putra, A. M. (2015). The impact of independent commissioners on company performance. Journal of Finance and Banking, 5(1), 150–160.

15) Rahmawati, S., et al. (2017). The impact of good corporate governance on company performance. Journal of Economics and Business, 12(2), 45–56.

16) Rosiana, A., & Mahardika, I. P. (2020). Financial performance and its reflection on corporate governance. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 8(3), 187–195.

17) Rosyati, S., & Fitriyana, D. (2022). The positive influence of independent commissioners on financial performance. Journal of Business Studies, 10(1), 88–96.

18) Suripto. (2021). Agency theory and its application in corporate governance. Journal of Business Theory, 5(2), 120–130.

19) Sunardi, M. (2018). Understanding human nature assumptions in agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 3(1), 40–47.

20) Utami, W., & Syafiqurrahman. (2017). Corporate governance reporting practices: Evidence from the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Journal of Corporate Governance, 7(2), 130–140.

21) Wibowo, A. (2020). The relationship between tangible assets and intellectual capital. Journal of Financial Research, 15(2), 67–74.

VOlUME 03 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2024

Indexed In