VOlUME 03 ISSUE 06 June 2024
1Zonif Fatahillah, 2Rini Triastuti, 3Muhammad Hendri Nuryadi
1,2,3Postgraduate Programme in Pancasila and Citizenship Education, FKIP, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2024.v3i6n20Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Students in class VII SMP Negeri 1 Plaosan Kab. Magetan who lack high learning motivation will have more influence on the level of capture of the subject matter presented by the teacher to carry out learning tasks more effectively so as to improve their learning achievement. Less than optimal student learning achievement requires student motivation in choosing the model to be applied in the learning process in class VII SMP Negeri 1 Plaosan Kab. Magetan. The learning model applied in learning Pancasila Education is Window Shopping or Science Shopping, where with this model students will be enthusiastic and more active and motivated in actively following Pancasila Education learning, so that it is hoped that learning achievement can increase. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of Window Shopping learning model and learning motivation on learning achievement of students of SMP Negeri 1 Plaosan, Magetan Regency. This study uses quantitative methods with multiple linear regression analysis techniques. The results of this study concluded that there was a significant influence of the Windows Shooping learning model variables and Learning Motivation on Learning Achievement both partially and simultaneously.
KEYWORDS:Learning Model, Windows Shooping, Learning Motivation, Learning Achievement
REFERENCES
1) Apriana, B. N. (2020). Window Shopping Type Cooperative Learning Model to Improve Social Studies Learning Outcomes in Class XI Students of SMP Negeri 1 Wanasaba. Scientific Journal of UNY, 2 (2).
2) Arianto. (2019). Improving the Learning Achievement of Students of MTs Al Mubarok Bandar Mataram Central Lampung Arianto STIT Al Mubarok. Journal RI'AYAH, 4(1), 90-97.
3) Buchori, A. (2018). Professional Teachers Mastering Methods and Skilled Teaching. Alfabeta.
4) Dimyati, & Mudjiono. (2013). Learning and Learning. Rineka Cipta.
5) Djamarah, S. B. A. Z. (2012). Psychology of Learning. Rineka Cipta.
6) Ghozali, I. (2017). Application of Multivariate Analysis with the SPSS Programme. UNDIP Publishing Agency.
7) Hamalik, O. (2013). Curriculum and Learning. Bumi Aksara.
8) Hanafiah, N., & Suhana, C. (2012). Concept of Learning Strategy. Refika Aditama.
9) Istianingsih, K. (2018). The Effect of Two Stay Two Stray Model with Window Shopping Activity on Interest and Learning Outcomes of MTS Al-Muttaqin Plemahan Kediri Students. Scientific Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2).
10) Mustopa, M. Z. (2020). Improving Students' Learning Achievement through the Scientific Approach of Window Shopping Learning Model (Gallery Visit) on the Material of Human Digestive System Class VIII SMPN 1 Praya 2019 - 2020 Academic Year. Journal of Social Science and Education, 4(2).
11) Nasrah, & Muafiah, A. (2020). Analysis of Student Motivation and Online Learning Outcomes during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Basic Education Research, 3(2), 207-213.
12) Nasution, S. (2014). Didactic Principles of Teaching. Bumi Aksara.
13) Purwanto, M. N. (2010). Psychology of Education. Teenage Workshop.
14) Rahma. (2017). The Effect of Window Shopping Cooperative Method on Classical Counselling Participation. Journal of Indonesian Education Research (JPPI), 2(2).
15) Rahman, S. (2021). The Importance of Learning Motivation in Improving Learning Outcomes. Independent Learning in Welcoming the Era of Society 5.0, November, 289-302.
16) Ratnawati, Mila. 2016. The relationship between children's perception of family atmosphere, self- image, and achievement motive with learning achievement in fifth grade students of Ta'Miriyah Elementary School. Surabaya. Anima Journal Vol XI No.42.
17) Revianto, D. (2021). The Effect of Windows Shopping Learning Model Assisted by Geoenzo on the Ability to Understand Mathematics Concepts in View of Student Learning Interest. Raden Intan State Islamic University.
18) Rohman, A. (2013). Understanding Education Science. CV Aswaja Pressindo.
19) Rusman. (2011). Learning Models (Developing Teacher Professionalism). Grafindo Persada.
20) Sardiman, A. M. (2016). Interaction and Motivation for Teaching and Learning. Rajawali Press.
21) Singarimbun, M., & Effendi, S. (2012). Survey Research Methods. LP3ES.
22) Slameto. (2020). Learning and Factors that Affect It. Rineka Cipta.
23) Soekamto, T., & Winataputra, U. S. (1997). Learning Theory and Learning Models. PAU Depdikbud Dikti.
24) Sugiyono. (2017). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. CV. Alfabeta.
25) Suryabrata, S. (2011). Psychology of Education. Raja Grafindo Persada.
26) Syah, M. (2012). Educational Psychology with a New Approach. Teenage Workshop.
27) Trianto. (2014). Integrated Learning Model. Bumi Aksara.
28) Trianto. (2019). Constructivistic Oriented Innovative Learning Models. Prestasi Pustaka.
29) Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 on the National Education System. (2003).
30) Uno, H. B. (2014). Motivation Theory and Its Measurement: Analysis in the Field of Education. Bumi Aksara.
31) Widodo, S. (2009). The effect of the pakem model on civic education learning achievement in terms of learning motivation of public elementary school students in Wonogiri Subdistrict in the 2008/2009 school year (experimental study on grade V SDN in Wonogiri Subdistrict). Postgraduate study programme. Educational Technology-UNS.
32) Winkel. (1996). Educational Psychology and Learning Evaluation. PT Gramedia.
33) Yusuf, S. (2009). Guidance and counselling programme in schools. Rizqi Press
VOlUME 03 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2024
Indexed In
