JUNE 2024

VOlUME 03 ISSUE 06 June 2024
Punishment of Rape Perpetrators from Qonun Jinayat's Perspective (Decision No. 2/JN/2022/MS-Sat Jo. Decision No. 3/JN/2023/MS. Aceh and Decision No. 3/JN/2019/MS.Skm)
1Dwi Irmayanti, 2Ainul Azizah, 3Al Khanif
1,2,3Students and Lecturers of the Master of Law Study Program, Faculty of Law, Jember University
DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2024.v3i6n18

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Qanun is a policy of the Aceh government which has special privileges in implementing special autonomy based on Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning Aceh Government which mandates the application of Islamic law to the entire region of Nangroe Aceh Darussalam Province. However, these provisions are very different from the provisions of the criminal law that applies in Indonesia, especially in imposing criminal sanctions in rape cases. This thesis research will examine the comparison of criminal sanctions for perpetrators of the crime of rape according to Qanun Jinayat and Criminal Code No. 1 of 1946, criminal sentences in case decision No. 2/JN/2022/MS-Sat Jo. Decision No. 3/JN/2023/MS. Aceh and Decision no. 3/JN/2019/MS. The SKM is appropriate based on the objectives of punishment, the policy of formulating punishment for perpetrators of the crime of rape based on Qanun Jinayat in the future. The type of research used in this thesis research is doctrial legal research using a statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Results of the research: The criminal sanctions imposed between cases of criminal acts of rape in the Criminal Code and criminal acts of rape in the Qanun Jinayat are very different. What both the Criminal Code and the Aceh Qanun have in common is that they both regulate that rape occurs outside of marriage, then both contain threats to anyone (anyone, everyone) meaning that there are sanctions from both laws. Criminal Imposition in Case Decision No. 2/JN/2022/MS-Sat Jo. Decision No. 3/JN/2023/MS. Aceh and Decision no. 3/JN/2019/MS. Skm is not in accordance with the purpose of punishment. The implementation of caning punishment in increasing public legal awareness is still considered not optimal. It is hoped that the competent institutions, namely the legislative body, in drafting the Aceh Qanun Jinayat, especially the Jarimah for sexual violence, can add a category for Jarimah based on the criteria for victims.

KEYWORDS:

Punishment, Rape Perpetrators, Qonun Jinayat Perspective

REFERENCES

1) RB Budi Prastowo, “delik formil/materiil, sifat melawan hukum formil/materiil dan pertanggung jawaban dalam tindak pidana korupsi kajian teori hukum pidana pada putusan mahkamah konstitusi RI Nomor 003/PUU-VI/2006”, 2006 Vol 24 No.3 Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia

2) Eddy OS Hiariej, 2016, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

3) Dewi Rohayati, “pengaturan yudisial pardon dalam pembaharuan hukum di Indonesia”, (2016) Vol 15 No 2, Wacana Paramarta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum XV:2:2016

4) Sudarto, Hukum Pidana I, (Semarang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro. 1990).

5) Barda Nawawi Arief, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group,2002).

6) I Made Pasek Diantha, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum (Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2017),

7) Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta, : Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2010).

8) R. Sugandi, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dengan Penjelasannya, (Surabaya: Usaha Nasional, 1980).

9) Doortje D Turangan, Penerapan Pasal 285 KUHP tentang Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perkosaan, dalam Karya Tulis Ilmiah tidak diterbitkan, (Manado: Universitas Sam Ratulangi, 2011).

10) https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visumetrepertum

11) Muslich, Ahmad Waedi, Pengantar dan Asas Hukum Pidana Islam: Fikih Jinayat, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2006).

12) Abdul Wahid dan Muhammad Irfan, Perlindungan Terhadap Korban Kekerasan Seksual (Advokasi atas Hak Asasi Perempuan), (Bandung: PT Refika Aditama, 2001)

13) Akbar Sayudi, “Upaya Perlindungan Korban Tindak Pidana Perkosaan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia”, dalam Jurnal Fiat Justisia, Vol. 10, No. 1, Januari 2016.

14) Mahfud Md, Politik Hukum di Indonesia,dalam Virdis Firmanillah Putra Yuniar , Penegakan Hukum dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan Terhadap Anak Berdasarkan Qanun Jinayat Aceh Vol. 2 No. 2, Juni 2019, Media Iuris

15) Kun Budianto, Hukum Pidana Islam Perspektif Keadilan, Nurani, Vol.15.No.1, Juni 2015, Fakultas Syariah, IAIN Palembang

16) Weni Wahyuni Jarimah Pemerkosaan Dalam Qonun Jinayat Aceh Perspektif Feminist Legal Theory, Volume 38 No. 1, Maret,Jurnal UNISSULA

17) A. Dzauli, Fiqih Jinayah(Upaya Menanggulangi kejahatan dalam Islam),( Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2000)

18) Wahbah Az-Zuhaili, dalam Akmal,Uqubat Ta’zir Jarimah Pelecehan Seksual Dalam Qanun Aceh No.6 Tahun 2014 Di Mahkamah Syariah Kota LANGSA (Perspektif Fiqih Kontemporer),

19) Rahmat Hakim, Hukum Pidana Islam (Fiqih Jinayah), (Pustaka Setia, Bandung: 2000).

20) Sudaryono, Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pembelajaran, (Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta, 2012)

21) Anas, Sudijono, Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan, (Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2009)

22) Miftahur Rifqi, Tingkat Kesadaran Hukum Mahasiswa Terhadap Qanun No. 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Fakultas Syariah & Hukum UN Ar-Raniry), Jurnal LEGITIMASI, Vol. VI No. 1, Januari-Juni 2017

23) AW. Widjaja, Kesadaran Hukum manusia dan Masyarakat Pancasila, (Era Swasta, Jakarta, 1982)

VOlUME 03 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2024

Indexed In