¹Kun Liu, ²Imelda L. An

¹Hunan University of Information Technology, Changsha, China

²Lyceum of the Philippines University, Batangas, Philippine

DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2024.v3i5n02

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This study analyses the use of new quality productivity theory in higher education management and develops a framework called the "multi-dimensional collaborative innovation management model" to tackle the challenges of globalisation and information technology. This concept combines the three dimensions of scientific and technological innovation, management innovation, and system innovation to promote effective resource allocation, improve educational quality and efficiency, and increase the education system's adaptability. This study uses mixed-methods research to verify the model's effectiveness in practical educational management as well as to present fresh theoretical perspectives and practical tactics for cultivating high-qualified talents who will satisfy the needs of future society.

KEYWORDS:

new quality productivity theory, university education management, innovation management framework, scientific and technological innovation, system innovation.

REFERENCES

1) Zhu, D., & Chen, W.(2017). Dynamic quotient: concept definition, type division and re-examination of measurement tools. Advances in Psychological Science, 25 (1), 10-20. https: / / doi.org/10.16082/j.cnki.issn.1001-4578.2017.03

2) Rosado, L., & Castaño Duque, G.A.(2015).The state of the art on the relationship between education and economic development.Economía del Caribe, 15, 89-104. https://doi.org/10.14482/ecoca.15.7192

3) Weisz, J., & Jivan, A.(2014).Study on productivity indicators in education.Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 3(2), 5-12.

4) Komariah, A.(2016).Transformational leadership for school productivity in vocational education.International Conference on Special Education in Southeast Asia Region 7th Series 2016. https://doi.org/10.2991/icse-15.2016.51

5) Huang, R.(2019).The improvement of the constitutive factors of the educational management in modern colleges and universities.

6) Wu, C.(2016).Problems and countermeasures of curriculum management in colleges and universities. https://doi.org/10.2991/meici-16.2016.226

7) Rodríguez Varela, D.de León La Fuente, L.A., & Galarza López, J.(2015).Los retos actuales de las instituciones de educación superior en el área de la gestión.

8) Hysa,F.(2014).School management and leadership in education.https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n3p303

9) Xu, L.(2021).The realistic dilemma and countermeasures of school governance in the new era. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2021.040414

10) Qiao Lianquan & Xin Liqing.(2015). Innovative curriculum teaching reform in colleges and universities: results, problems and countermeasures. On Higher education studies in China.

11) Yoo, J., Yoo, S., Kim, J., & Kwon, S.(2016).A study on the research trend of innovative school in Korea.Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction.

12) Liu, Jiang, Zhukang, L., & Wangqianli, X.(2017).Research on the coordinated development of experimental education between local colleges and senior high schools.2nd International Seminar on Education Innovation and Economic Management (SEIEM 2017).

13) Ryymin, E., Corado, C., Friman, M., Majuri, M., & Viskari, M.(2018).Leading research and development for educational innovations. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educação.

14) Sebayang, A.F.(2005).Membangun Link And Match Pendidikan Indonesia.Mimbar, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v21i4.193

15) Wolf, A.(2002).Does education matter?: Myths about education and economic growth. https://doi.org/10.18662/LUMENSS.2016.0501.03

16) Iaquinto,K.(2014).How to improve education quality.ICSE-15. https://doi.org/10.2991/ICSE-15.2016.51

VOlUME 03 ISSUE 05 MAY 2024