MAY 2024

VOlUME 03 ISSUE 05 MAY 2024
Technology Acceptance Modelling for Jconnect Mobile Users (Study at Bank Jatim Regional Lamongan)
1Clarissa Duika Augusta, 2Nanis Susanti, 3Endah Budiarti
1,2,3Master of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2024.v3i5n11

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This research aims to analyze the influence of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on behavioral intention by mediating attitude. This research focuses on customers from Bank Jatim Regional Lamongan that using Jconnect Mobile. This research used purposive sampling with a sample of 166 respondents. These respondents were selected based on certain criteria, namely customers from Bank Jatim Regional Lamongan that using Jconnect Mobile aged between 20 to 45 years old. SmartPLS V4 was chosen to evaluate research results. The results show that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are proven to have a direct positive and significant effect on attitude. Perceived usefulness is proven to have a direct positive and positive effect on behavioral intention, while perceived ease of use is not proven to have a direct effect on behavioral intention. Then, attitude is proven to have a direct positive and significant effect on behavioral intention. Attitude has been proven to be able to partially mediate the relationship between perceived usefulness and behavioral intention, and also fully mediate the relationship between perceived ease of use and behavioral intention.

KEYWORDS:

Perceived usefulness Perceived ease of use Attitude Behavioral intention SmartPLS V4

REFERENCES

1) Agyei, J., Sun, S., Abrokwah, E., Penney, E. K., & Ofori-Boafo, R. (2020). Mobile banking adoption: Examining the role of personality traits. SAGE Open, 10(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020932918

2) Andre, Listiana Pebriyanti, H., Kartono, R., & Moro Sundjaja, A. (2021). The effect of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived risk, and technology readiness on intention to use e-banking in Jakarta. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(10), 6829–6836.

3) Astria, V., & Basyir, M. (2022). Pengaruh perceived usefulness dan perceived ease of use terhadap behavioral intention yang dimediasi oleh user satisfaction pada nasabah pengguna aplikasi BCA Syariah Mobile di Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Manajemen, 4(2), 379–390. http:jim.unsyiah.ac.id/ekm

4) Chaouali, W., Souiden, N., & Ladhari, R. (2017). Explaining adoption of mobile banking with the theory of trying, general self-confidence, and cynicism. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 35(April 2016), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.11.009

5) Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ese of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quaterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.33621

6) Fachreza, J. A., & Besra, E. (2022). Effect of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on intention to use mobile banking (Brimo) with attitude as intervening variable (study at Lubuk Basung sub-branch office of pt. Bank Rakyat Indonesia). Enrichment: Journal of …, 12(3), 1552–1561. https://www.enrichment.iocspublisher.org/index.php/enrichment/article/view/616

7) Gu, J. C., Lee, S. C., & Suh, Y. H. (2009). Determinants of behavioral intention to mobile banking. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11605–11616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.024

8) Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119409137.ch4

9) Heryani, I. I. P., Simanjuntak, M., & Maulana, A. (2020). Perilaku penggunaan internet banking sebagai alat transaksi finansial. Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 6(1), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.17358/jabm.6.1.86

10) Kim, Y. J., Chun, J. U., & Song, J. (2009). Investigating the role of attitude in technology acceptance from an attitude strength perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 29(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.01.011

11) Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management. In Soldering & Surface Mount Technology (15th ed., Vol. 13, Issue 3). Person Pretice Hall, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1108/ssmt.2001.21913cab.040

12) Malhotra, Y., & Galletta, D. F. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: Theoritical bases and empirical validation. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 32, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.1999.772658

13) Mulyati, Y., Alfian, A., & Asnimar. (2023). The role of attitude in mediating the influence of perceived usefulness on intention to use Nagari Mobile Banking. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies, 6(5), 1855–1863. https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v6-i5-02

14) Muñoz-Leiva, F., Climent-Climent, S., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2017). Determinantes de la intención de uso de las aplicaciones de banca para móviles: una extensión del modelo TAM clásico. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 21(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjme.2016.12.001

15) Mutahar, A. M., Daud, N. M., Thurasamy, R., Isaac, O., & Abdulsalam, R. (2018). The mediating of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use: The case of mobile banking in Yemen. International Journal of Technology Diffusion, 9(2), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijtd.2018040102

16) Mutia, A. (2022). Survei: Mayoritas Publik Indonesia Belum Pernah Akses Internet atau Mobile-Banking. Databooks. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/08/06/survei-mayoritas-publikindonesia-belum-pernah-akses-internet-atau-mobile-banking

17) Norng, S. (2022). Factors influencing mobile banking adoption in Cambodia: the structuring of TAM, DIT, and trust with TPB. Asian Journal of Business Research, 12(3), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.220133

18) Noviarni, E. (2014). Analisi adopsi layanan internet banking oleh nasabah perbankan di Pekanbaru (Technology Acceptance Model). Jurnal Al-Iqtishaq, 1, 27–40.

19) Pranoto, M. O., & Setianegara, R. G. (2020). Analisis pengaruh persepsi manfaat, persepsi kemudahan, dan keamanan terhada minat nasabah menggunakan mobile banking. Keunis Majalah Ilmiah, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.32497/keunis.v8i1.2117

20) Prastiawan, D. I., Aisjah, S., & Rofiaty. (2021). The effect of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, social influence on the use of mobile banking through the mediation of attitude toward use. Asia Pacific Management and Business Application, 9(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.apmba.2021.009.03.4

21) Prayudi, I. G., Sukaatmadja, I. P. G., Yasa, N. N. K., & Giantari, I. G. A. K. (2022). The role of trust in mediation the effect of perception of ease of use and perception of usefulness on intention to re-using the mobile banking service. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 9(4), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v9n4.2102

22) Rahayu, F. S., Budianto, D., & Palyama, D. (2017). Analisis penerimaan e-Learning menggunakan Technology Accepatance Model (TAM). Jurnal Terapan Teknologi Informasi, 1(2), 85–95.

23) Raza, S. A., Umer, A., & Shah, N. (2017). New determinants of ease of use and perceived usefulness for mobile banking adoption. International Journal of Electronic Customer Relationship Management, 11(1), 44–65. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJECRM.2017.086751

24) Rehman, Z. U., Omar, S. S. B., Zabri, S. B. M., & Lohana, S. (2019). Mobile banking adoption and its determinants in Malaysia. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9(1), 4231–4239. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.L3015.119119

25) Rehman, Z. U., & Shaikh, F. A. (2020). Critical factors influencing the behavioral intention of consumers towards mobile banking in Malaysia. Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research, 10(1), 5265–5269. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.3320

26) Reid, M., & Levy, Y. (2008). Integrating trust and computer self-efficacy with TAM: An empirical assessment of customers acceptance of banking information systems (BIS) in Jamaica. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 12(3), 1–18.

27) Saidani, B., Aditya, S., & Manalu, I. F. (2022). Pengaruh perceived security dan perceived ease of use terhadap intention to use dengan trust sebagai intervening pada penggunaan apliksi pembayaran digital di Jakarta. Jurnal Bisnis, Manajemen, Dan Keuangan, 3(1), 186–197.

28) Sana, P. A. A., Sri, S. N. W., Kerti, Y. N. N., & Gde, S. I. P. (2019). Technology acceptance model and trust in explaining customer intention to use internet banking. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 91(7), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2019-07.29

29) Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoritical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

30) Widiar, G., Yuniarinto, A., & Yulianti, I. (2022). Perceived ease of ese’s effects on behavioral intention mediated by perceived usefulness and trust. Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 2(4), 1829–1844. https://doi.org/10.55324/iss.v2i4.397

31) Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257

VOlUME 03 ISSUE 05 MAY 2024

Indexed In