Joxerramon Bengoetxea

Ph D Edinburgh, Dr h.c. Helsinki, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU

DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2024.v3i3n06

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Advocating democracy and the right to decide over forceful union in the Spanish and European contexts, this paper makes modest theoretical proposals to protect the right to decide and to self-government of sub-state nations or peoples. The peaceful solution of conflicts involving contested claims over territory and national sovereignty calls for a pluralist concept of democracy, recovering the centrality of self-determination as the self-assertion of a people, a political community that has been systematically denied the freedom to decide on its own political status and aspiration. Constitutional law based on popular sovereignty often neglects the question of the definition of the demos as the prefigured and axiomatic constituency. If the Constitution is further interpreted as precluding any claim to self-determination by a constituency, and any debate about that claim then an undemocratic model of militant constitutionalism ensues. That militant scheme is not so much about protecting democracy as it is about imposing a national model, a pre-defined demos. This contribution seeks to revisit the claim of sovereignty of the Catalan process and the constitutional doctrine of the Spanish judiciary precluding the Catalan Parliament from engaging in political debates on the right to decide, in relation to the issue of the militant democracy model

KEYWORDS:

self-government, self-determination, militant democracy model, right to decide, forceful unión, European integration and Sub-state Nations, Multilevel Governance, Catalan sovereignty process

REFERENCES

1) Arzoz, Xabier and Markku Suksi, “Comparing constitutional adjudication of self-determination claims”, 25 (4) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2018, 452-475.

2) Bengoetxea, Joxerramon, Diálogos Judiciales y Autogobierno, IVAP, Oñati 2022.

3) Bengoetxea, Joxerramon, “El demos como Grundnorm. Autodeterminación, derecho a decidir y constitución democrática”, 19 Eunomía. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, 2020: 459-471.

4) Bengoetxea, Joxerramon, “Secession v Forceful Union. A provisional enquiry into the right to decide to sucede and the obligation to belong”, in C. Closa, C. Margiotta and G. Martinico (eds), Between Democracy and Law, Routledge, London, 2020, 29-48.

5) Capoccia, G. “Militant democracy: The institutional bases of democratic self-preservation”. 9 Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2013, 207–226.

6) Cornago, Noé, ‘Beyond self-determination: norms contestation, constituent diplomacies and the co-production of sovereignty’, 2 Global Constitutionalism, 2017, 327.

7) Gutmann, J. and S. Voigt, “Militant constitutionalism: a promising concept to make constitutional backsliding less likely?”, Public Choice , 2021.

8) Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms, MIT, Boston, 1999.

9) Loewenstein, Karl L., “Militant democracy and fundamental rights, I”, 31(3) American Political Science Review, 1937, 417–432.

10) Malkopoulou, Anthoula and Ludwig Norman, “Three Models of Democratic Self-Defence” in Anthoula Malkopoulou and Alexander Kirschner (eds), Militant Democracy and its Critics, Populism, Parties, Extremism, Edinburgh, 2019, Ch 5).

11) Mancini, Susana, ‘Secession and Self-Determination’, in Michel Rosenfeld and Andras Sajó (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford UP, 2012, 481.

12) Margiotta, Costanza, L’ultimo diritto. Profili storici e teorici della secessione, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2005.

13) Margiotta, Costanza, “An Update on Secession as the ‘ultimate right’: For a Liminal Legality”, in C. Closa, C. Margiotta and G. Martinico (eds), Between Democracy and Law, Routledge, London 2020, 9-28.

14) Martinico, Giuseppe, “Courts and Identity Conflicts in Federal and Regional Systems”, Sant’Anna Legal Studies, STALS, Research Paper 3/2016.

15) Payero, Lucía, “El esencialismo constitucional: la Constitución Española al servicio de la Unidad Nacional”, 6 (3) Oñati Socio-legal Series, 2016, 726-48.

16) Qvortrup, Matt, Referendums and Ethnic Conflict, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014.

17) Rijpkema, Bastiaan, Militant Democracy. The Limits of Democratic Tolerance, Routledge, London, 2021.

18) Roeder, Philip, National Secession, Persuasion and Violence in Independence Campaigns, Cornell UP, 2018.

19) Ruiz, Marian Ahumada, "The Spanish Constitutional Court", in Andras Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich (eds), Comparative Constitutional Reasoning, Cambridge UP, 2017, 604-640.

20) Steinberg, Richard, “Overview: Realism in International Law” in 96 Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting, The Promise of International Law, 2002, 260-62.

21) Wouters, Jan and Linda Hamid, ‘We the People: Self-Determination v. Sovereignty in the Case of De Facto States’, 1 Inter Gentes, 2016, 53.

VOlUME 03 ISSUE 03 MARCH 2024