¹ Akhmad Mukhibun,²Andayani,³Sumarwati

^1,2,3 Universitas Sebelas Maret, Insinyur Sutami Street Number 36, Kentingan, Jebres, Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2024.v3i12n27

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Reading skills among junior high school students in Indonesia are categorized as low to medium according to PISA 2018 data. The Ministry of Education and Culture's 2022 survey shows that Indonesian students do not understand the content of the texts they read. This makes research on strategies to improve reading literacy important. This study aims to determine the difference in reading comprehension skills on the theme of ecological wisdom between students taught with the SQ3R method and the conventional (direct) method. This research is quantitative research with a quasi-experimental pretest-postest non-equivalent control group design. The population of this study were seventh grade students of SMP Karanganyar Regency Rural Area. The samples of this study were students of grade 7-D SMP Negeri 1 Karangpandan and 7-B SMP Negeri 2 Karangpandan as the experimental group and students of grade 7-F SMP Negeri 1 Karangpandan and 7-C SMP Negeri 2 Karangpadan as the control group. The sampling technique used two-stage cluster random sampling, which is group sampling in stages. The data collection technique was carried out with an instrument of reading comprehension ability on the theme of ecological wisdom developed by the researcher. Data analysis techniques include descriptive data analysis, analysis requirement test, and inferential analysis. The results showed that the ability to read comprehension on the theme of ecological wisdom between students taught by the SQ3R method was better than students taught by the direct method. The effect size test results show the amount of the method's influence is 33.6% or has a large effect. Comparison of the average scores of the initial test and the final test showed that the increase in the scores of students taught with the SQ3R method was 9.33%, while the increase of students taught with the direct method was 4.15%. The results of this study are expected to contribute to Indonesian language teaching strategies especially in the area of improving reading literacy and reading comprehension skills among students of other Rural Area Junior High Schools.

KEYWORDS:

SQ3R, local culture, reading literacy, ecological wisdom, rural junior high school in Indonesia

REFERENCES

1) Ahad, R., Foong, L. M., Mustafa, M. Z., Rahman, A. A., Fuad, N., & Seri Kawi, F. F. (2024). Analysis of Electroencephalogram Data Activity During Reading Using Scanning and Survey Question Read Recite Review Techniques. 2024 9th International STEM Education Conference (ISTEM-Ed), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/iSTEM-Ed62750.2024.10663155

2) Almakahleh, A., & Alramamneh, A. (2019). The Impact of A Program Based on SQ3R Strategy to Improving Reading Comprehension Skills among Students with Learning Disabilities in the Sixth Grade. An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities), 33(2), 275–304. https://doi.org/10.35552/0247-033-002-005

3) Anisa, A. R., Ipungkarti, A. A., & Saffanah, K. N. (2021). Pengaruh Kurangnya Literasi serta Kemampuan dalam Berpikir Kritis yang Masih Rendah dalam Pendidikan di Indonesia. Current Research in Education: Conference Series Journal, 01.

4) Aramide, K., & Abimbola, M. (2021). The Effectiveness of SQ3R Technique in Curbing Aliteracy Among High School Students in Ilesa, Southwest, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–24. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac

5) Arikunto, S. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Suatu Pengantar Pendekatan Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Pustaka Pelajar.

6) Artis, A. B. (2008). Improving Marketing Students’ Reading Comprehension With the SQ3R Method. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(2), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475308318070

7) Asiri, A. (2017). The Effectiveness of Using SQ3R to Teach Reading Skills. Asian Journal of Educational Research, 5(1). www.multidisciplinaryjournals.com

8) Badan Bahasa. (2021, July 10). Badan Bahasa Sikapi Rendahnya Tingkat Literasi di Indonesia. Badan Pengembangan Dan Pembinaan Bahasa Kemdikbud.

9) Barberà, M. B., & Josep, H. G. (2024). La implementació de tecnologies per a l’aprenentatge i el coneixement per a millorar el nivell de comprensió lectora en llengua catalana. Revista de Llengua i Dret, 81, 256–274. https://doi.org/10.58992/rld.i81.2024.4101

10) Batubara, H. H., & Ariani, D. N. (2018). Implementasi Program Gerakan Literasi Sekolah di Sekolah Dasar Negeri Gugus Sungai Miai Banjarmasin. Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 4(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.30870/jpsd.v4i1.2965

11) Dewi, S. M., Prawiyogi, A. G., Anwar, A. S., & Wahyuni, C. S. (2021). Efektivitas Strategi Direct Reading Thingking Activities terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(1), 453–455. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i1.786

12) Dionisio Murakami, M. N. (2024). Comparación de dos métodos de estudio SQ3R y SOAR para una mejor comprensión lectora. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 9, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-408

13) Fatimah, S., Harahap, E. P., & Nurfadilah, N. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 14 Kota Jambi. Kode : Jurnal Bahasa, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.24114/kjb.v13i2.59576

14) Fauziah. (2024, March 25). Pentingnya Penguatan Literasi. Dinas Perpustakaan Dan Kearsipan Provinsi DKI Jakarta.

15) Frans, S. A., Ani, Y., & Wijaya, Y. A. (2023). Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman Siswa Sekolah Dasar [Reading Comprehension Skills of Elementary School Students]. Diligentia: Journal of Theology and Christian Education, 5(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.19166/dil.v5i1.6567

16) Husni, T. (2024, October). Implementasi Budaya Literasi Baca Tulis melalui Membaca Pemahaman. BPMP Aceh Kemendikbud.

17) Juanda, J., Afandi, I., & Yunus, A. F. (2024). Digital Short Story Literacy and the Character of Environmentally Concerned Students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(2), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1502.10

18) Katsara, O. (2023). The Value of Cultural Diversity as a Language Curriculum Resource for Promoting Internationalization at Home. In Global Perspectives on the Internationalization of Higher Education (pp. 93–108). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5929-4.ch006

19) Kemdikbud. (2023). Optimalisasi Program Buku Bacaan Bermutu untuk Penguatan Literasi Indonesia.

20) Kurniawan, P. Y., Zulaeha, I., & Yuniawan, T. (2023). Kemampuan Literasi Siswa Kelas V dalam Pelaksanaan Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM) di SD Negeri 1 Tegalgandu Brebes. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang , 595–601. http://pps.unnes.ac.id/pps2/prodi/prosiding-pascasarjana-unnes

21) Kusumawati, A. J. (2019). Students’ Perception on SQ3R Method in Reading Comprehension with the Help of Technology. Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Education and Training Technologies, 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1145/3337682.3337705

22) Lu, O. H. T., Huang, A. Y. Q., Kuo, C.-Y., Chen, I. Y. L., & Yang, S. J. H. (2020). Sequence pattern mining for the identification of reading behavior based on SQ3R reading strategy. ICCE 2020 - 28th International Conference on Computers in Education.

23) Malhotra, G. S., & Mehta, M. (2015). Study Skills. In A Practical Approach to Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Adolescents (pp. 57–90). Springer India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2241-5_4

24) Mawardani, M., & Prajawinanti, A. (2023). Upaya Perpustakaan Candi Ilmu dalam Menumbuhkan Budaya Literasi pada Anak di Desa Candirejo Kecamatan Ponggok Kabupaten Blitar. Shaut Al-Maktabah : Jurnal Perpustakaan, Arsip Dan Dokumentasi, 15(2), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.37108/shaut.v15i2.996

25) MIUC. (2020, November 17). What is the SQ3R study method and how to use it? Marbella International University Centre.

26) Myren-Svelstad, P. E. (2020). Sustainable Literary Competence: Connecting Literature Education to Education for Sustainability. Humanities, 9(4), 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/h9040141

27) Napitupulu, E. L. (2023, October 2). Kemampuan Memahami Bacaan Masih Rendah. Kompas.Id.

28) Njatrijani, R. (2018). Kearifan Lokal Dalam Perspektif Budaya Kota Semarang. Gema Keadilan, 5(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2018.3580

29) Nurwidodo, N., Amin, M., Ibrohim, I., & Sueb, S. (2020). The Role of Eco-School Program (Adiwiyata) towards Environmental Literacy of High School Students. European Journal of Educational Research, volume-9-2020(volume-9-issue-3-july-2020), 1089–1103. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1089

30) OECD. (2022). Indonesia Studen Performance (PISA 2022). Eucation GPS OECD.

31) Putra, I. P. (2023, February 16). Kepala Perpusnas: Pemahaman Anak Indonesia Terhadap Bacaan Hanya 15%. Medcom.Id.

32) Rada, T., & Jayanti, U. N. A. D. (2022). The Effect of SQ3R Learning Model on Students’ Metacognitive Ability in the Topics of Ecosystem. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 23(3), 1158–1172. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i3.pp1158-1172

33) Rahmi, Y., & Marnola, I. (2020). Peningkatan Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman Siswa melalui Model Pembelajaran Cooperative Integrated Reading and Compotion (CIRC). Jurnal Basicedu, 4(3), 662–672. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i3.406

34) Rizaty, M. A. (2022). 90% Anak di Negara Miskin Belum Bisa Membaca secara Komprehensif.

35) Robinson, F. P. (1934). An Aid for Improving Reading Rate. The Journal of Educational Research, 27(6), 453–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1934.10880425

36) Robinson, F. P., & Hall, P. (1941). Studies of higher-level reading abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 32(4), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062111

37) Robinson, F. P., & McCollom, F. H. (1934). Reading rate and comprehension accuracy as determinants of reading test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 25(2), 154–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070180

38) Rosita, F., & Parozak, M. R. G. (2023). Analisis SWOT Penerapan Budaya Literasi Siswa SMA Di SMAN 1 Muntilan. Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education, 4(1), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v4i1.587

39) Safitri, V., & Dafit, F. (2021). Peran Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Membaca Dan Menulis Melalui Gerakan Literasi Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(3), 1356–1364. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i3.938

40) Setyaningsih, E. (2019). Bringing critical literacy into tertiary EFL reading class. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20220

41) Stahl, N. A., & Armstrong, S. L. (2020). So Much More Than SQ3R: A Life History of Francis P. Robinson. Reading Psychology, 41(4), 287–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2020.1768979

42) Sudarsono, F. W., & Astutik, Y. (2024). Evaluating the Effectiveness of the SQ3R Method in Enhancing Students’ Reading Proficiency. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching, 9(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v9i1.1598

43) Sugiharti, R. E., Pramintari, R. D., & Destianingsih, I. (2020). SQ3R Method as A Solution To Improve Reading Comprehension Skills in Elementary School. Indonesian Journal of Primary Education, 4(2), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijpe.v4i2.26300

44) Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

45) Sulistyaningsih, L. S. (2008). Metode SQ3R. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

46) Syah, N., Hidayat, H., Yuca, V., Ardi, Z., & Magistarina, E. (2021). Examining the Effects of Ecoliteracy on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior through Adiwiyata Environmental Education for Indonesian Students. Journal of Social Studies Education Research Sosyal Bilgiler Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(4), 209–230. www.jsser.org

47) Taslidere, E., & Eryilmaz, A. (2012). The Relative Effectiveness of Integrated Reading Study Strategy and Conceptual Physics Approach. Research in Science Education, 42(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9194-1

48) Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan Dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup, peraturan.bpk.go.id 1 (2009).

49) Utari, U., Degeng, I. N. S., & Akbar, S. (2016). Pembelajaran Tematik Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Di Sekolah Dasar Dalam Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean (MEA). Jurnal Teori Dan Praksis Pembelajaran IPS, 1(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.17977/um022v1i12016p039

50) Wahyuningsih, S., Nafisah, P., Mulyono, N., & Hidayat, Y. (2023). Utilization of SQ3R Method to Enhance English Reading Skills: Students’ Voices in The Indonesian Higher Education Context. International Journal Corner of Educational Research, 2(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.54012/ijcer.v2i1.175

51) Wei, C.-W., Hsieh, Z.-H., Chen, N.-S., & Kinshuk. (2012). Construction of Reading Guidance Mechanism on E-book Reader Applications for Improving Learners’ English Comprehension Capabilities. 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 170–172. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2012.130

52) Wuryanto, H., & Abduh, M. (2022, December 5). Mengkaji Kembali Hasil PISA sebagai Pendekatan Inovasi Pembelajaran untuk Peningkatan Kompetensi Literasi dan Numerasi. Direktorat Guru Pendidikan Dasar Kemdikbud.

VOlUME 03 ISSUE 12 DECEMBER 2024