Florentino Silva Becerra

Tenured research professor*, SNII level 1, PRODEP Profile, assigned to the Department of Education Studies of the University Center of Social Sciences and Humanities of the University of Guadalajara Guadalajara, Jalisco, México

DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2024.v3i11n13

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This work integrates the group from the elucidation that is presented in a multidimensional way of which the theoretical bodies that make up this study on tensions, instead of invalidating them, makes it possible to think about the group from the constitution of a network of intersections with varied effects, of senses and non- senses, product of human groups. Its objective is to explain through the inductive generation of conceptual categories expressed in the regularities between investigated phenomena that access possible interpretative theories of the reality of fragmentation as an institutional group. Addresses a qualitative methodology; a flexible design, dealing with the social interaction between teachers and managers in a subjective, dynamic reality composed of a multiplicity of contexts. From ethnography, open interviews and participant observation is permanently addressed, as well as the use of reflexivity, obtained from the analysis of the subjective and intersubjective meanings of collegiate work, where fragmentation was analyzed through participation and significance. of the group. The effects that the group produces on the subjects that comprise it, giving rise to group hood, understood as “a relational structure where it is possible to recognize a clear discrimination between subject and object.

KEYWORDS:

FORMATIVE fields, fields of meaning, epistemic didactics, correctionality, construction of knowledge.

REFERENCES

1) Abreu, O., Gallegos, M. C., Jácome, J. G., & Martínez, R. J. (2017). Didactics: Epistemology and definition in the Faculty of Administrative and Economic Sciences of the Technical University of Northern Ecuador. University education, 10(3), 81-92.

2) Albizu, E. (2005). "Sense": A frontier of philosophy. Topics, (13), 5-27.

3) Alcaraz, E., Hughes, B., & Gómez, A. (2002). Legal Spanish. Ariel.

4) Alcudia, J. A. N. (2016). In defense of the World. Critical notes on Markus Gabriel's hyperpluralist ontology. Analysis. Journal of Philosophical Research, 3(1), 137-147.

5) Amparan, A. C. (1998). The theory of fields in Pierre Bourdieu. Polis, 1(2), 179-200.

6) Bourdieu, P and Wacquant, L. (1995). Answers. For a reflective anthropology. Grijalbo.

7) _________ (2005). An invitation to reflective sociology. 21st century editors

8) Bourdieu, P. (1997). Practical Reasons. On the theory of action. Anagrama Editorial.

9) _________ (1999). Practical reasons. Anagram.

10) _________(2008).Things said. Gedisa.

11) Bueno Martínez, G. (1996). The meaning of life. Six readings of moral philosophy. Oviedo, Pentalfa.

12) Diaz, D. (2001). University didactics: an alternative to transform teaching. Pedagogical Action, 10, 64-72. D-University of the Andes Venezuela.

13) Díaz-Barriga, Á. (2013). Guide for the development of a didactic sequence. UNAM, Mexico, consulted on, 10(04), 1-15.

14) Donati, P. (2006). Rethink society. International University Editions.

15) Gabriel M. (2017) Meaning and existence. Herder Editorial.

16) García, A. P. (2008). What do we talk about when we talk about local identity? . Prism (Historical), (22), 83-100.

17) Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1998). Data collection strategies. Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research, 124-171.

18) Gütl, C., & Chang, V. (2008). Ecosystem-based theoretical models for learning in environments of the 21st century. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 3(2008).

19) Leoni, L.J.; Venville, G., & Wallace, J. (2012). Knowledge that Counts in Global Community: Exploring the Contributions of Integrated Curriculum. Routledge.

20) Lewin, K. (1946): "Action research and minority problems", in Gertrude Weis Lewin (ed.), Resolving Social Conflict, London, Harper & Row.

21) Markus, G.(2017). Why the world does not exist. Past & Present.

22) Montoya, H. V. (2008). The training, epistemological and investigative fields: elements that contribute to an emerging science such as didactology. Poliantea, 4(6).

23) Paquay, Altet, Charlier and Perrenoud (2005). The Professional Training of the Teacher. Strategies and competencies. FCE.

24) Ramírez Grajeda, B. (2017). Identity as a construction of meaning. Scaffolds, 14(33), 195-216.

25) Rogers, X. (2007). Pedagogy of integration: Competencies and integration of knowledge in teaching. Central American Educational and Cultural Coordination.

26) SEP (2022). The training fields to understand and transform our reality. National Commission for the Continuous Improvement of Education.

27) SEP (2023). Curricular integration: challenge for the practice of secondary school teachers. National Commission for the Continuous Improvement of Education.

28) Simmel, G. (1939). Sociology. Studies on forms of socialization. Volume II. Espasa-Calpe SA.

29) Tobón, S. (2013). Training projects: transversality and development of skills for the knowledge society. CIFE Institute.

30) Van der Linde, G. E. (2007). Why is interdisciplinarity important in higher education? Notebooks of University Pedagogy, 4(8): 11-12.

31) Vargas, J. C. (2020). On the “presence” of the object of knowledge in Duns Scotus's theory of intentionality. Areté, 32(1), 219-239.

32) Weber, M. (1984). Types of domination (Vol. 38). NoBooks Editorial.

33) Zapata, V. (2003). The evolution of the concept of pedagogical knowledge. Your transformation paths. Education and Pedagogy, 15(37), 177-184.

VOlUME 03 ISSUE 11 NOVEMBER 2024