VOlUME 03 ISSUE 01 JANUARY 2024
1Dwia Aries Tina Pulubuhu, 2Rahmatia, 3Sherry Adelia, 4Siti Fatimah, 5Amril Hans, 6Seniwati
1Sociology Department, Social and Political Sciences Faculty, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
2Economic Department, Economic and Business Faculty, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
3Economic Department, Economic and Business Faculty, Muhammadiyah University, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
4Government Department, Social and Political Sciences Faculty, Yapis University, Papua, Jayapura, Indonesia
5Public Administration Department, Social and Political Sciences Faculty, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
6International Relations Department, Social and Political Sciences Faculty, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2024.v3i1n07Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This service activity aims to enhance the impact of the Center of Peace, Conflict, and Democracy (CPCD) in the Wajo District by raising participants’ comprehension of conflict resolution and honing their negotiation abilities. The CPCD team has determined that conflicts between the residents of Wajo and PT Perkebunan Nusantara (PTPN) stem from disputes over land use rights (HGU). The research center at Hasanuddin University assisted in conflict areas, specifically in South Sulawesi and eastern Indonesia. Furthermore, CPCD delivered messages in training to identify possible opportunities for conflict resolution. To evaluate the outcomes of the training, the securitization approach was utilized, which focuses on the actions taken by actors such as local government officials, for example regents, sub-district heads, and village heads. The training results show that their level of understanding is increasing, and the CPCD’s approach is novel in this region.
KEYWORDS:CPCD, Securitization, Conflicts, Government, Wajo District.
REFERENCES
1) Arbani, T. S. (2020) Penataan Perizinan Dan Status Perkebunan Tanpa Hak Guna Usaha , El-Iqtishady, 2(2), pp. 97–110.
2) Fahrimal, Y. and Safpuriyadi (2018) ‘Komunikasi Strategik dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Agraria Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Riset Komunikasi, 1(1), pp. 109–127. doi: 10.24329/jurkom.v1i1.18.
3) Hak, I., Nonci, H. and Budiarto, T. (2019) ‘Ragam Intervensi di Pedesaan: Resolusi Konflik Agraria Menuju Desa Maju Reforma Agraria (DAMARA) Di Desa Uraso’, Sosioreligius, 1(4), pp. 91–109. Available at: http://103.55.216.56/index.php/Sosioreligius/article/view/10662.
4) Hamid, I., Tina, D. A. and Cangara, S. (2015) ‘Konflik Agraria Dan Jalan Keluarnya Konflik PTPN XIV Dengan Masyarakat Polongbangkeng-Takalar Dan Keera-Wajo’, J. Analisis, 4(2), pp. 141–148.
5) Kamaruddin, Najamuddin and Patahuddin (2018) ‘Menjaga Tanah Leluhur: Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara di Sulawesi Selatan 2003-2016’, Jurnal Pattingalloang, 5(1), pp. 121–129. doi: 10.26858/pattingalloang.v5i1.6726.
6) Muh. Kamin, A. B., Amal, I. and Khandiq, M. R. (2018) ‘Dilema Pemetaan Partisipatif Wilayah Masyarakat Adat di Indonesia: Upaya Resolusi Konflik Agraria dan Kritiknya’, Prosiding Senas POLHI ke-1, 1(1), pp. 107–120.
7) Melati, V. (2020). The Impact of Migration Securitization on The Increase of Islamophobia-Based Attacks In The United States In 2015-2019. Indonesian Journal of International Relations, 4(1), 6991.
8) Nurdin, J. (2014, Juli 2). Warga Keera Ancam Duduki Kantor Bupati Wajo. Retrieved Juli 20, 2022, from Sindo News: https://daerah.sindonews.com/berita/878939/25/warga-keera-ancam-duduki-kantor-bupati-wajo.
9) Odolczyk, M. (2020). Securitising the War On Terror. E-International Relations, October 30.
10) Zakie, M. (2016) ‘Konflik Agraria Yang Tak Pernah Reda’, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY, 24(1), pp. 40–55. doi: 10.22219/jihl.v24i1.4256.