¹I Wayan Ana, ²Made Susini, ³Ketut Subagia

^1,2,3Warmadewa University, Bali, Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2024.v3i1n06

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The high volume of legal cases involving foreigners in Indonesia underscores the necessity for proficient legal interpreters, as not all foreigners possess a fluent command of the Indonesian language. As a result, the presence of legal interpreters is essential to aid foreigners navigating the legal system. The initial phase of research, which assessed the effectiveness and user experiences of legal interpreters in assisting foreigners throughout the legal proceedings, revealed that police officers engaged two categories of interpreters: ad hoc and professional interpreters. Ad hoc interpreters are temporary interpreters enlisted for specific purposes such as reporting or particular activities. These interpreters may include individuals like tour guides, drivers, spouses of foreigners, family members, and even household staff. On occasion, police officers also utilized colleagues, fellow officers, prosecutors, or lawyers proficient in English to act as legal interpreters. In contrast, professional interpreters often possess certification from reputable institutions, such as universities, translators' associations, or English language colleges, ensuring a strong command of English. According to perspectives from police officers, prosecutors, and lawyers, ad hoc interpreters tend to lack linguistic expertise and interpreting skills, leading to subpar interpretation quality. Conversely, professional interpreters exhibit superior linguistic knowledge and are largely proficient in interpreting, resulting in significantly improved interpretation services compared to ad hoc options. Legal practitioners who employ professional interpreters find their assistance invaluable. However, from the viewpoint of detainees, in-house interpreters or interpreters associated with law offices have a tendency to cast suspicion on the foreigners they assist and may steer them toward confessing to what the lawyers desire. Based on the results and discussion, it has been determined that non-professional interpreters correspond to the ad hoc interpreters as described in the initial year of research. The interpreters of this category engage in interpretation tasks only occasionally, typically ranging from 1 to 4 instances over a span of 1 to 2 years. Professional interpreters, on the contrary, are skilled language mediators proficient in English, possessing expertise in various interpreting methods, especially in legal contexts. They are affiliated with professional associations and boast over three years of practical experience. Out of a group of 10 proficient interpreters who responded to the questionnaires, three are employed full-time, while the remaining seven operate as independent freelancers. Among the three full-time interpreters, one is stationed in-house. However, these interpreters did not completely concur with the feedback provided by users. Out of the fifteen feedback points submitted by users, a majority believed that the feedback was somewhat inaccurate. Nonetheless, some points were acknowledged for valid reasons: Firstly, considering the high volume of cases presented at the police office, the interpreters might not be well-versed in all the requisite legal terminology. Additionally, not all legal interpreters have been involved in police office proceedings, which results in an unfamiliarity with interrogation methods and procedures. Secondly, instances of interpreters displaying partiality and assisting foreign clients could stem from a lack of comprehension regarding the ethical guidelines governing legal interpreters. Misunderstandings might arise from payment arrangements, briefings, and directives received from supervisors (in the case of in-house interpreters) or from the police (for freelancers). The involvement of lawyers, foreigners, or the police in their compensation might lead to interpreters providing advice, suggestions, and direction for foreigners to admit certain actions. However, only a small subset of interpreters is inclined to do so, while the majority refrains from such actions.

KEYWORDS:

legal interpreting, interpreter, users of legal interpreters

REFERENCES

1) Alan, T. S. E. C. (2001) ‘Is the Simultaneous Mode Feasible and Desirable in Court Interpreting?’

2) Ana, I. W. (2018) ‘The Challenge of the Interpreter in Interpreting Non-Native English Speakers – A Case Study – EIT Case at Court of Gianyar – Bali’, in Mulyadi, D. (ed.) English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) 2nd. Semarang: Faculty of Foreign Language and Culture Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, pp. 502–509. Available at: https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/ELLIC/issue/view/932.

3) Ana, I. W. (2021) Level of Pragmatic Equivalence of Indonesian into English Legal Text Translation. Udayana University.

4) Ana, I. W., Susini, M. and Subagia, K. (2022) ‘Dilemmatic Role of Legal Interpreters in Assisting Foreigners in Legal Setting’, International Linguistics Research, 5(2), pp. 23–29. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30560/ilr.v5n2p23.

5) Bancroft, M. A. et al. (2013) ‘Interpreting in the gray zone: Where community and legal interpreting intersect’, Translation & Interpreting, The, 5(1), pp. 94–113.

6) Berk-Seligson, S. (1999) ‘The impact of court interpreting on the coerciveness of leading questions’, Forensic Linguistics, 6, pp. 30–56.

7) Cao, D. (2007) Translating Law. Edited by S. Bassnett and E. Gentzler. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd. Available at: http://www.multilingual-matters.com

8) Cao, D. and Zhao, X. (2013) ‘Legal Translation at the United Nations’, in Legal Translation in Context.

9) Cranefield, J. and Yoong, P. (2007) ‘The role of the translator/interpreter in knowledge transfer environments’, Knowledge and Process Management. Wiley Online Library, 14(2), pp. 95–103.

10) Effendi, R. P. (2008) Cara Mudah Menulis dan Menerjemahkan. Jakarta: Yayasan Bina Edukasi dan Konsultasi.

11) González, R. D., Vásquez, V. F. and Mikkelson, H. (1991) ‘Fundamentals of court interpretation’, Theory, policy, and practice.

12) Hale, S. (2020) ‘Court interpreting: The need to raise the bar: Court interpreters as specialized experts’, in The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics. Routledge, pp. 485–501.

13) Hale, S. B. (2004) The discourse of court interpreting: Discourse practices of the law, the witness, and the interpreter. John Benjamins Publishing.

14) Jacobson, B. (2001) ‘Addition in Court Interpreting’, in International Conference Critical Link 3. Montreal, Quebec.

15) De Jongh, E. M. (2008) ‘Court interpreting: Linguistic presence v. linguistic absence’, Florida Bar Journal. THE FLORIDA BAR, 82(7), p. 20.

16) Mikkelson, H. (1998) ‘Towards a redefinition of the role of the court interpreter’, Interpreting. John Benjamins, 3(1), pp. 21– 45.

17) Monteoliva-Garcia, E. (2018) ‘The last ten years of legal interpreting research (2008-2017). A review of research in the eld of legal interpreting’, Language and Law/Linguagem e Direito, 5(1), pp. 38–61.

18) Nakane, I. (2009) ‘The myth of an’invisible mediator’: An Australian case study of English-Japanese police interpreting’, Portal: Journal of multidisciplinary international studies, 6(1), pp. 1–16.

19) Oxburgh, G. et al. (2015) Communication in investigative and legal contexts: Integrated approaches from forensic psychology, linguistics and law enforcement. John Wiley & Sons.

20) PöCHHACKER, F. (2009) ‘Issues in interpreting studies’, in The Routledge companion to translation studies. Routledge, pp. 142–154.

21) Puspani, I. A. M. (2010) Penerjemahan Lisan Di Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar. Desertasi. Universitas Udayana.

22) Russell, D. L. (2000) Interpreting in legal contexts: Consecutive and simultaneous interpretation. University of Calgary.

VOlUME 03 ISSUE 01 JANUARY 2024