¹Firmansyah Fikri Hayqal,²Dhimas Pratama Windyarto,³Muhammad Haekal Fikri Hartono

^1,2,3Master of Notary, Faculty of law, University of Jember

DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2023.v2i7n15

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The fact that customary land is not included as an object of land registration in Government Regulation No. 24/1997 causes indigenous peoples' control over customary land not to be based on rights that can be proven in writing. This causes the rights of indigenous peoples over their customary land to be marginalised. Following up on this, the Government enacted Minister of Agrarian Affairs Regulation No. 9/2016 on Procedures for Determining Communal Rights to Land of Customary Law Communities and Communities in Certain Areas, which was later revoked and replaced by Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning Regulation No. 18/2019 on Procedures for Administration of Customary Land of Customary Law Communities. Initially, indigenous peoples' land tenure was based on communal rights, and then it was changed to be based on the administration of customary land rights. Therefore, it is necessary to know the scope and purpose of customary land administration and the difference with land registration to understand how to guarantee the legal certainty of the control rights of indigenous peoples over their customary land. This research is normative juridical type by using a legislative approach and analytical approach. The research results show that customary land is not ordered for registration in Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. The administration of customary land is to record customary land in the land registry book so that it differs from land registration. Recording customary land in the land registry book can minimise overlapping disputes between indigenous peoples and private parties.

KEYWORDS:

legal certainty, customary law communities, administration of customary land rights

REFERENCES

1) Harsono, Boedi. 2005. Hukum Agraria Indonesia: Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya. Jakarta: Djambatan.

2) Mahardika, Rahadiyan Veda, & Gatot Suyanto. Kedudukan Hukum Badan Bank Tanah Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum. Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan. Vol. 3. No. 2. 2022.

3) Mahardika, Rahadiyan Veda, Bhim Prakoso, & Iswi Hariyani. 2022. Kedudukan Subyek Hukum Ditinjau Dari Hak Keperdataan (Refleksi: Terjadinya Tumpang Tindih Lahan Hak Guna Usaha). Jember: UM Jember Press.

4) Permana, Bayu Indra, Bhim Prakoso, & Iswi Hariyani. Legal Certainty of Income Tax Exemption on the Transfer of Rights to Land in the Sharing of Collective Integration Rights. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research Studies. Vol. 2, No. 11, 2022.

5) Prakoso, Bhim. Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap Sebagai Dasar Perubahan Sistem Publikasi Pendaftaran Tanah. Journal of Private and Economic Law. Vol. 1. No. 1, 2021.

6) Pratiwi, Shrimanti Indira. Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Ulayat antara Masyarakat Hukum Adat dengan Taman Nasional Tessonilo. Program Magister Kenotariatan. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya. 2015.

7) Samosir, Djamanat. 2013. Hukum Adat Indonesia Eksistensi Dalam Dinamika Perkembangan Hukum di Indonesia, Bandung: Nuansa Aulia.

8) Sumardjono, Maria S.W. 2001. Kebijakan Pertanahan antara Regulasi & Implementasi. Jakarta: Kompas.

9) Yostina, Mariska. Hak Komunal atas Tanah Masyarakat Hukum Adat di Indonesia. Program Magister Kenotariatan. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya. 2016.

VOlUME 02 ISSUE 07 JULY 2023