¹Sulastri, ²Dhendy Arwani Farjianto

¹Faculty of Law, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia

²Magister of Law, Universitas Jayabaya Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2023.v2i6n04

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Pure prodeo is a method of litigation free of charge, or using no fees at all, meaning that the trial costs are given by justice seekers without any cost, including using stamp duty fees, so that decisions and decisions do not use stamp duty. In this case, there is the same meaning space, namely between practice in court which is generally required to use stamp duty, and pure fee which actually happens the other way around. the decision or decision of the court judge must be stamped, and the most important question is how the validity of the decision or determination of pure prodeo in relation to law number 13 of 1985 concerning stamp duty. This study uses a normative juridical research method, with a statutory research approach technique, from the results of research conducted the validity of decisions or decisions without stamp duty remains valid, and stamp duty on pure prodeo cannot be equated with civil evidence and fees free of charge by pure prodeo practice, this is because it is charged by the burden of costs from the state.

KEYWORDS:

Validity, Pure Prodeo, Materai, Indonesia

REFERENCES

1) Manan, Abdul, Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama, Prenada Media, Jakarta, 2005.

2) Mujahidin, Ahmad, Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syar’iyah di Indonesia, IKAHI, Jakarta Pusat, 2008.

3) Syukur, Sarmin, Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama di Indonesia, Jaudar Press, Surabaya, 2017.

4) Buku II Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Administrasi Peradilan Agama, cet. 2013.

5) Kertas Kerja Pengadilan Agama Wonosobo Tahun Angggaran 2018.

6) Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2014.

7) Undang-undang Nomor 13 Tahun 1985 TENTANG BEA METERAI

VOlUME 02 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2023