VOlUME 02 ISSUE 03 MARCH 2023
1Huda Herawati Gayatri,2Kamari,3Sri Budiyono,4Andhyka Murti,5Iffah Nur Hayati
1Public Junior High School 2 Muntilan, Magelang
2Open University, Indonesia
3Widya Dharma University, Klaten, Central Java
4College of Economics of API Pariwisata, Yogyakarta
5Yogyakarta State University
DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2023.v2i3n06Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was t improve learning achievement using the Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) method, at SMP Negeri 2 Muntilan, Magelang, which is located at Jalan Wates Muntilan KP 56417 (0293) 587567, Muntilan, Magelang, Central Java. The object of this study were 9 D grade students, 2022/2023 academic year, with a total of 30 students, consisting of 18 girls and 12 boys. The research process or learning improvement is carried out in 2 cycles. Cycle I was held on Thursday, 19 October 2022 and cycle II was held on Thursday, 9 November 2022. Each cycle consists of 4 stages, namely: (1) Planning (Plan), (2) Implementation of Action (Action), ( 3) Observation (Observation), and (4) Reflection (Reflection). The results of the study concluded that the use of the student’s team achievement division method can improve learning activities and learning outcomes in students in grade 9 D, Muntilan 1 Public Middle School, Magelang, Central Java. The results of the research in Cycle I that reached KKM/Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal/ Minimum Completeness Criteria (70) were 4 students or 1.2% of 30 students. In cycle II, 27 students achieved KKM (70) or in other words, reached 900%. Thus it has increased by 90%. The results of the classroom action research above imply that by using the students teams achievement division method not only do students want to learn academic skills and content, but also learn to understand several aspects of life, especially in collaborating or working together to advance or achieve all.
KEYWORDS:KKM (Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal/ Minimum Completeness Criteria; Student Team Achievement Devision (STAD); social science; learning achievement
REFERENCES
1) Arifin. Z. 1991. Evaluasi Instruksional. Bandung : Remaja Resda Karya.
2) Budiyono, S., Waluyo, H. J., Slamet, S. Y., & Rohmadi, M. 2018. Text-based language learning to improve student
motivation.American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR), 2(11), 27-34.
https://ajhssr.com/wpcontent/uploads/2018/11/D182112734.pdf
3) Budiyono, S., Pranawa, E., & Yuwono, S. E. 2021. Language as a communication tool, motivation, achievement,
negotiation, and business professionally. Seminar Nasional Riset Linguistik dan Pengajaran Bahasa (SENARILIP V). V,
pp. 73-78. Politeknik Negeri Bali. https://ojs2.pnb.ac.id/index.php/proceedings/article/view/219/123
4) Budiyono, S. and Ngumarno. 2019a. “Improving Student Learning Achievements through Application of the Student
Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) Method”. Journal of Applied Studies in Language, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 2, p. 140-147,
dec. 2019. ISSN 2615-4706. http://ojs.pnb.ac.id/index.php/JASL/article/view/1370
5) ___________. 2021b. Diskusi, Wahana Motoivasi, Kolaborasi, dan Prestasi. Klaten: Unwidha Press.
6) Budiyono, Sri., Harta, Dwi, and Yuliantoro, A. 2021. “The Application of Discussion Method for Improving the Students'
Logical Thinking Skills”. Journal of Applied Studies in Language, 5(1), 56-66. doi:10.31940/jasl.v5i1.2345
http://ojs.pnb.ac.id/index.php/JASL/article/view/2345
7) Budiyono, Sri. 2021 “Bimbingan Teknis (Bimtek) Penguatan Kompetensi GuruMata Pelajaran UTBK Tahun 2021”. Jurnal
Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat UNSIQ, Vol. 8 No. 3, 291 – 299. ISSN (print): 2354-869X | ISSN (online):
2614-3763 https://ojs.unsiq.ac.id/index.php/ppkm/article/view/1870/1220
8) Cecep Kustandi & Bambang Sutjipto. 2011. Media Pembelajaran Manual dan Digital. Bogor: Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia.
9) Dimyati, M. 2006. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
10) Hamalik, Or. 2001. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
11) Hamid, A. 2017. “Agama dan Kesehatan Mental dalam Perspektif Psikologi Agama”. Healthy Tadulako Journal (Jurnal
Kesehatan Tadulako. ISSN 2502-0749
http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/HealthyTadulako/article/view/8714
12) Lestari. Rini. Dan Purwati 2012. Hubungan Antara Religiusitas Dengan Tingkah Laku Koping. Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah
Psikologi. Vol 6. No.1.
13) Iva Rifa. 2012. Koleksi Games Edukatif di Dalam dan Luar Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Flashbook.
14) Kherysuryawan. 2020. Materi Terpadu Kelas 9 SMP sesuai Buku K-13 Revisi Terbaru.
https://www.kherysuryawan.id/2020/08/materi-ips-terpadu-kelas-9-smp-sesuai.html (Diunsuh pada hari Kamis, tanggal 2
Februari 2023, jam 08.06 WIB).
15) Luqmanul Hakim, 2012. Sejarah Permainan Dam Ular. Diakses dari
http://www.carigold.com/portal/forums/archive/index.php/t-371618.html pada tanggal 19 APRIL 2019 jam 12:17 WIB.
16) Magdalena, I., Septianti, N., Barliyanti, L., & Faranwansa, S. T. 2020. “Penerapan Model Pembelajan Paikem Gembrot di
Masa Pandemi Covid-19 terhadap Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa di SD N Kedaung Barat IV”. EDISI : Jurnal Edukasi
dan Sains, Volume 2, Nomor 2, Agustus 2020; 348-365 https://ejournal.stitpn.ac.id/index.php/edisi
17) Miroud, S. 2021. An evaluation of the reading texts in The English text book for the 3rd year of secondary education.
Algerian Scientific Journal Platform, 10(2), 69–92. https://www.asjp.cerist.dz/en/PresentationRevue /300
18) Muhtarom, M. 2020. Education development of nation character and culture in Pesantren. INOVASI, 2, 114-123
19) Mudzakir. Ahmad. Dan Sutrisno. Joko 1997. Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung. Pustaka Setia.
20) M. Husna, A. 2009. 100+ Permainan Tradisional Indonesia untuk Kreativitas, Ketangkasan, dan Keakraban. Yogyakarta:
Penerbit Andi.
21) Pasaribu, I. L. dan Simandjuntak, B. 1983. Metode Belajar dan Kesulitan Belajar. Bandung : Tarsito
22) Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2001. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
23) Sadiman.S. 2003. Media Pendidikan Pengertian, Pengembangan dan Pemanfaatannya. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
24) Slameto. 2003. Belajar & Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta
25) Suryabrata.S. 2006. Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
26) Syafi”i, A., Marfianto, E., dan Rodiyah, S.K. 2018. “Studi tentang Prestasi Belajar Siswa dalam Berbagai Aspek dan Faktor
yang Mempengaruhi”. Jurnal Komunikasi Pendidikan, Vol 2, No 2, 2018. Sukoharjo: Universitas Bangun Nusantara.
https://journal.univetbantara.ac.id/index.php/komdik/article/view/114/102
27) Syah.M 2006. Psiklogi Belajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
28) Tyas, M. A., Nurkamto, J., Marmanto, S., & Laksani, H. 2019. Developing higher order thinking skills (HOTS) – based
questions: IndonesianEFL teachers’ challenges, 2(1), 52-63. doi:10.17501/26307413.2019.2106
29) Wardhani, I.G.A.K dkk (2008). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta : Universias Terbuka