Danang Satria Nugraha

Sanata Dharma University, Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2023.v2i10n07

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This study combines Cognitive Semantics Analysis (CSA) and Qualitative Method (QM) to delve into the intricate interplay between language, culture, and emotion within Indonesian proverbs. Through a comprehensive examination of a diverse selection of proverbs, the study aims to uncover the inherent expressions of joy and happiness encoded in these linguistic gems. By applying the lens of CSA, the study strives to reveal the underlying conceptual structures that shape the joyful nuances within these proverbs. The QM further facilitates the exploration of cultural connotations and sociolinguistic aspects that contribute to the manifestation of joy in the proverbs. The results show that (1) the intricate web of metaphorical mappings formed the basis of joy expression in Indonesian proverbs, such as nature-centered metaphors, community and sharing, achievements and success, and festivals and rituals, and (2) the joy-related proverbs served as significant cultural markers that reflected historical events, religious beliefs, and communal values. This study deepens our understanding of the rich cultural and emotional tapestry woven into the Indonesian language. It sheds light on the broader realm of cognitive semantics analysis in studying idiomatic expressions and their emotional underpinnings.

KEYWORDS:

cognitive semantics, emotional resonances, Indonesian proverbs, joy, linguistic representation

REFERENCES

1) Abu Rumman, R., Haider, A. S., Yagi, S., & Al-Adwan, A. (2023). A corpus-assisted cognitive analysis of metaphors in the Arabic subtitling of English TV series. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2231622

2) Andersson, D. (2013). Understanding figurative proverbs: A model based on conceptual blending. Folklore (United Kingdom), 124(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015587X.2012.734442

3) Brataatmadja, H. K. (2002). Kamus 5000 Peribahasa Indonesia. Kanisius.

4) Bredis, M. A., Dimoglo, M. S., & Lomakina, O. V. (2020). Paremias in modern linguistics: Approaches to study, text-forming and linguocultural potential. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 11(2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2020-11-2-265-284

5) Fujita, R., Matsuo, T., & Hochin, T. (2019). Analysis of perceptions on school mottos as proverbs between Japanese and Indonesian. International Journal of Software Innovation, 7(1), 80–103. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSI.2019010105

6) Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(83)80009-3

7) Giang, D. N. (2023). Vietnamese Concepts of Love Through Idioms: A Conceptual Metaphor Approach. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(4), 855–866. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1304.06

8) Gibbs Jr., R. W. (1992). What do idioms really mean? Journal of Memory and Language, 31(4), 485–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90025-S

9) Gibbs Jr., R. W., Bogdanovich, J. M., Sykes, J. R., & Barr, D. J. (1997). Metaphor in idiom comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.2506

10) Gibbs Jr., R. W., Costa Lima, P. L., & Francozo, E. (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(7), 1189–1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.009

11) Gibbs Jr., R. W., & O’Brien, J. E. (1990). Idioms and mental imagery: The metaphorical motivation for idiomatic meaning. Cognition, 36(1), 35–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90053-M

12) Ibrahim, I. H., & Usman, J. (2021). Cultural values in Acehnese farming-related proverbs. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 364–371. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i2.32323

13) Jibreel, I. (2023). Online Machine Translation Efficiency in Translating Fixed Expressions Between English and Arabic (Proverbs as a Case-in-Point). Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(5), 1148–1158. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1305.07

14) Julich-Warpakowski, N., & Sobrino, P. P. (2023). Introduction: Current challenges in metaphor research. Metaphor and the Social World, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00026.jul

15) Kayed, M. A., Essa, L. B., & Alkayid, M. (2023). A contrastive study of the connotative meanings of “dog-related” expressions in English and Jordanian proverbs: Implications for translators and language teachers. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana, 19(1), 66–101. https://doi.org/10.30842/alp2306573719166101

16) Khakimzyanova, D. F., & Shamsutdinova, E. K. (2016). Corpus linguistics in proverbs and sayings study: Evidence from different languages. Social Sciences (Pakistan), 11(15), 3770–3773. https://doi.org/10.3923/sscience.2016.3770.3773

17) Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. In Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408

18) Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor, creativity, and discourse. DELTA Documentacao de Estudos Em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada, 26(SPL.ISS.), 719–738. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-44502010000300016

19) Kövecses, Z. (2012). The scope of metaphor. In Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894677.79

20) Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where metaphors come from. Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford University Press.

21) Kövecses, Z. (2018). Metaphor, cognition, culture. In Handbook of Advances in Culture and Psychology (Vol. 7). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190879228.003.0002

22) Kövecses, Z. (2022). Some recent issues in conceptual metaphor theory. In Researching Metaphors: Towards a Comprehensive Account. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003184041-3

23) Kövecses, Z. (2023). Metaphorical Creativity in Discourse. Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature, 47(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.17951/lsmll.2023.47.1.55-70

24) Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge University Press.

25) Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

26) Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language andthought (pp. 195–221). Cambridge University Press.

27) Lau, K. J., Tokofsky, P. I., & Winick, S. D. (2004). What goes around comes around: The circulation of proverbs in contemporary life. In What Goes Around Comes Around.

28) Lemghari, E. M. (2022). On the Role of Source and Target Words’ Meanings in Metaphorical Conceptualizations. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 67(3), 73–103. https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2022-0005

29) Orlova, T. G. (2020). The implementation of the conception of friendship on the basis of com-parative structural-semantic analysis of English and Russian proverbs. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 11(2), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2020-11-2-301-318

30) Panut, S., Sudrajat, H., & Bangun, A. (2007). Kamus Peribahasa Indonesia. Kesaint Blanc.

31) Phuong, V. T. (2023). Factors Affecting the Learning of English Proverbs and Idioms of English-Majored Students at University of Khanh Hoa, Vietnam. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.901004

32) Richardson, C., Yaapar, M. S., & Abdullah, N. F. L. (2017). Understanding Malay and Chinese work ethics in Malaysia through proverbs. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 17(3), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595817742930

33) Shaimardanova, M. R., & Akhmetova, L. A. (2015). Language means of expression of communicative-pragmatic frame “advice” in the proverbs with gender component (on the material of the English and Russian languages). Journal of Language and Literature, 6(3), 101–104. https://doi.org/10.7813/jll.2015/6-3/22

34) Spellerberg, C. (2022). Proverbial markers and their significance for linguistic proverb definitions: An experimental investigation. Yearbook of Phraseology, 13(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1515/phras-2022-0007

35) Stachurska, A. (2023). Linguistic Image of the Woman in Kashubian, English and Polish Proverbs. Ezikov Svyat, 21(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.37708/ezs.swu.v21.i1.7

36) Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis Bahasa [Method and technique of language study]. Sanata Dharma University Press.

37) Szpila, G. (2017). Contemporary proverbs - Theoretical investigations versus questionnaire study | Współczesne przysłowie - rozważania teoretyczne vs. badanie ankietowe. Jezyk Polski, 97(2), 5–22.

38) Tavangar, M., Diyanati, M., & Amouzadeh, M. (2022). Pragmatics of proverb translation: The case of English and Persian. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 18(1), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2022-0006

39) Villers, D. (2022). Proverbs and Paroemias: Definition and Methodology Issues | Proverbes et parémies: problèmes définitoires et méthodologiques. RILCE, 38(2), 520–536. https://doi.org/10.15581/008.38.2.520-36

40) Wu, J., Zhou, W., & Shao, B. (2023). On English proverb variation from the perspective of linguistic creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1213649

41) Ying, Y., Mursitama, T. N., & Rumeser, J. A. A. (2017). Comparison of animal idioms in Chinese and Indonesian. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 1167–1170. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7530

42) Yuan, G., & Sun, Y. (2023). A bibliometric study of metaphor research and its implications (2010–2020). Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2022.2113413

43) Zaikauskienė, D. (2021). Interpretation of Proverb Meaning: Theory and Practice | Patarlės reikšmės interpretacija: Teorija ir praktika. Tautosakos Darbai, 62, 11–27.

44) Zhao, W. (2012). An analysis of social proverbs from the perspective of cultural semiotics. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(10), 2073–2080. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.10.2073-2080

VOlUME 02 ISSUE 10 OCTOBER 2023