¹Faiz Muhammad Zaland

¹Assistant Professor of Kabul University, Kabul City, The Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Ph.D. Candidate, Faculty of Political Science, Al- Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The aim of this research paper is to look at certain underlying principles in the complex relationship of tribal leadership and the egalitarian structure of tribes. This paper will attempt to explain the presence of tribal leaders (Khans) in the segmentary and egalitarian structure of the tribal belt in Southeast, Afghanistan. In addition, it will examine the characteristics of egalitarian structure of Pushtun tribes and the rule of the Khan as a broker of the state or tribe.

The majority of the southeast Pukhtun tribes live within the geographic boarders of Afghanistan, the exception being the Wazir and Mehsud tribes who also reside in Pakistan. The common characteristic of all Pukhtun tribes is the focus on paternal linage for determining membership within the Pukhtun tribal segments. Another shared characteristic among Pukhtun tribes is the derivation of their segmentation, which is determined by their social composition. (Tapper, 1983)

Explaining the political structure of these tribes is difficult due to the multiplicity within tribal leadership. A number of leaders can influence the tribal decision-making process including: the tribal Masher (tribal leader), the Mullah, a Warlord or a Mujaheedin Commander, and sometimes a Khan. The influence each of these can wield depends on the particular situation. This paper will address the tribal political structure through a more detailed examination of Khan-ship. The paper will show that the authority of the Khan is quite limited and his power severely constrained; he is much more of a leader than a ruler and thus his tribesmen tend to be followers rather than subjects. (Anderson, 1983)

Pukhtun tribes tend toward a more acephalous structure, meaning a community without a direct chief or leader. This paper will discuss the Khan’s unique position within this egalitarian tribal structure. As a result, the focus of this paper is the various aspects of traditional leadership within the egalitarian tribal structure of Southeastern Afghanistan.

KEYWORDS:

Tribe, State, Khan, Politics, Egalitarian Structure, Southeast Afghanistan, Afghanistan

REFERENCES

1) Ahmad, A. (1983). Resistance and Control in Pakistan. London: Routledge.

2) Ahmad, A., & Hart, D. (1984). Islam in Tribal Societies-From the Atlas to the Indus. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

3) Anderson, J. (1973). Tribe and Community among the Ghilzai Pashtun. North Carolina: University of North Carolina.

4) Anderson, J. (1983). Khan and Khel: Dialectics of Pakhtun Tribalism. In R. Tapper, The Conflict of Tribe and State in Iran and Afghanistan (pp. 119-149). New York: St.Martin's Press.

5) Hart, D. (2001). Qabila. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis Publishers.

6) Ruttig, T. (2009). Loya Paktia's Insurgency: The Haqqamo Network As An Autonomous Entity. In A. Giustozzi, Decoding the New Taliban (pp. 57-88). Longon: Hurst Publishers Ltd.

7) The Liaison Office. (2008, December 13). Retrieved June 09, 2011, from www.tlo-afghanistan.org: http://www.tlo-afghanistan.org/sites/default/files/Working-Paper-Series/TLO-LAND-BASED-CONFLICT-IN-AFGHANISTAN-THE-CASE-OF-PAKTIA-December-2008.pdf

8) The Liaison Office. (2009, March). Retrieved March 12, 2011, from .usip.org: http://www.usip.org/files/file/jirga_judge.pdf

9) Trives, S. (2009). Roots of The Insurgency in The Southeast. In A. Giustozzi, Decoding the New Taliban (pp. 89-99). London: Hurst Publicshers Ltd.

10) Wardak, A. (2004, September 3). .institute-for-afghan-studies.org. Retrieved 01 23, 2011, from Institute for Afghan Studies: http://www.institute-for-afghan-studies.org/AFGHAN%20CONFLICT/LOYA%20JIRGA/Jirgabywardak.pdf

11) Yousufzai.M: Gohar, A. (2005, January). Fresno Pacific University. Retrieved 02 28, 2011, from peace.fresno.edu: http://peace.fresno.edu/docs/Pukhtoon_Jirga.pdf

VOlUME 02 ISSUE 01 JANUARY 2023